Let's review Seton Hall

The home for Big East hoops

Re: Let's review Seton Hall

Postby sju88grad » Thu Jul 15, 2021 1:34 pm

Hall2012 wrote:
LMS wrote:Seton Hall doesn’t have an MD on staff? What am I missing here?


You're missing nothing. His lawyer's clearly an idiot, unable to tell the difference between a doctor and a trainer. Sounds to me like he got some bad advice from a lawyer who's either overly ambitious or just straight scamming him (I hope for Myles' sake he doesn't have to pay if he loses). Based on how poorly the suit reads, I wouldn't trust this lawyer to win him anything even if he has a good case. Unfortunately, it's a black eye for Seton Hall even if they did nothing wrong.


That’s the part that really sucks. Sadly, the world we live in is guilty until proven innocent.
sju88grad
 
Posts: 1013
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2015 11:10 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Let's review Seton Hall

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Let's review Seton Hall

Postby Husky_U » Thu Jul 15, 2021 1:41 pm

Hall2012 wrote:
LMS wrote:Seton Hall doesn’t have an MD on staff? What am I missing here?


You're missing nothing. His lawyer's clearly an idiot, unable to tell the difference between a doctor and a trainer. Sounds to me like he got some bad advice from a lawyer who's either overly ambitious or just straight scamming him (I hope for Myles' sake he doesn't have to pay if he loses). Based on how poorly the suit reads, I wouldn't trust this lawyer to win him anything even if he has a good case. Unfortunately, it's a black eye for Seton Hall even if they did nothing wrong.


Ya, that suit is a hot mess. Did he hire Ollie's lawyer? Sucks when a beloved alum takes the scortched earth route.
User avatar
Husky_U
 
Posts: 934
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 5:26 pm

Re: Let's review Seton Hall

Postby NJRedman » Thu Jul 15, 2021 3:40 pm

Hall2012 wrote:
LMS wrote:Seton Hall doesn’t have an MD on staff? What am I missing here?


You're missing nothing. His lawyer's clearly an idiot, unable to tell the difference between a doctor and a trainer. Sounds to me like he got some bad advice from a lawyer who's either overly ambitious or just straight scamming him (I hope for Myles' sake he doesn't have to pay if he loses). Based on how poorly the suit reads, I wouldn't trust this lawyer to win him anything even if he has a good case. Unfortunately, it's a black eye for Seton Hall even if they did nothing wrong.


Yeah but lets not act like Willard would NEVER do anything shady to win games
User avatar
NJRedman
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:40 am

Re: Let's review Seton Hall

Postby kayako » Thu Jul 15, 2021 6:19 pm

ArmyVet wrote:Sad to see he has gone this route. Without knowing all of the details of his medical care, if he really thinks that all 2000 point college scorers should automatically get drafted, he is sorely misguided. Not many people including myself ever imagined he would be an NBA player.


I've always thought it's risky for an all-conference level jr to return for his senior year because of limited upside. Luka Garza may be another one of those cases. I get that he's probably a little salty, but man this is kinda shocking because I thought he was a Seton Hall lifer.
supernova
User avatar
kayako
 
Posts: 3836
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 5:22 am

Re: Let's review Seton Hall

Postby SJUBBALL » Thu Jul 15, 2021 6:41 pm

This sucks because that suit seems like complete BS however it will without a doubt make it harder to recruit
SJUBBALL
 
Posts: 616
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 10:10 am

Re: Let's review Seton Hall

Postby Hall2012 » Fri Jul 16, 2021 9:10 am

NJRedman wrote:
Hall2012 wrote:
LMS wrote:Seton Hall doesn’t have an MD on staff? What am I missing here?


You're missing nothing. His lawyer's clearly an idiot, unable to tell the difference between a doctor and a trainer. Sounds to me like he got some bad advice from a lawyer who's either overly ambitious or just straight scamming him (I hope for Myles' sake he doesn't have to pay if he loses). Based on how poorly the suit reads, I wouldn't trust this lawyer to win him anything even if he has a good case. Unfortunately, it's a black eye for Seton Hall even if they did nothing wrong.


Yeah but lets not act like Willard would NEVER do anything shady to win games


There's nothing shady about hiring Tiny Morton. It was 100% out in the open and well within the rules. Now, Morton himself seems a bit of a shady character and I certainly think it was risky on Willard's part to bring him anywhere near the program, but there's no evidence of wrongdoing from Willard there.
Seton Hall Pirates
Big East Tournament Champions: 1991, 1993, 2016
Big East Regular Season Champions: 1992, 1993, 2020
Hall2012
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 3:04 pm

Re: Let's review Seton Hall

Postby NJRedman » Sat Jul 17, 2021 10:07 am

Hall2012 wrote:
NJRedman wrote:
Hall2012 wrote:
You're missing nothing. His lawyer's clearly an idiot, unable to tell the difference between a doctor and a trainer. Sounds to me like he got some bad advice from a lawyer who's either overly ambitious or just straight scamming him (I hope for Myles' sake he doesn't have to pay if he loses). Based on how poorly the suit reads, I wouldn't trust this lawyer to win him anything even if he has a good case. Unfortunately, it's a black eye for Seton Hall even if they did nothing wrong.


Yeah but lets not act like Willard would NEVER do anything shady to win games


There's nothing shady about hiring Tiny Morton. It was 100% out in the open and well within the rules. Now, Morton himself seems a bit of a shady character and I certainly think it was risky on Willard's part to bring him anywhere near the program, but there's no evidence of wrongdoing from Willard there.


Didn't even mention Tiny and that just proves my point. Willard isn't above doing shady shit to keep his job. Now with this going on look for him to jump ship after this season to any power conference program most likely a lower level power program like a BC, Wake, Pitt etc.
User avatar
NJRedman
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:40 am

Re: Let's review Seton Hall

Postby Hall2012 » Sat Jul 17, 2021 10:16 am

NJRedman wrote:
Hall2012 wrote:
NJRedman wrote:
Yeah but lets not act like Willard would NEVER do anything shady to win games


There's nothing shady about hiring Tiny Morton. It was 100% out in the open and well within the rules. Now, Morton himself seems a bit of a shady character and I certainly think it was risky on Willard's part to bring him anywhere near the program, but there's no evidence of wrongdoing from Willard there.


Didn't even mention Tiny and that just proves my point. Willard isn't above doing shady shit to keep his job. Now with this going on look for him to jump ship after this season to any power conference program most likely a lower level power program like a BC, Wake, Pitt etc.


Proves your point, how? That I reasonably assumed you were referencing something butt hurt SJU fans still moan about 8 years later? Bottom line is there was nothing shady about it. Willard didn't hide that he was hiring Tiny because he didn't have to because it wasn't in violation of anything.
Seton Hall Pirates
Big East Tournament Champions: 1991, 1993, 2016
Big East Regular Season Champions: 1992, 1993, 2020
Hall2012
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 3:04 pm

Re: Let's review Seton Hall

Postby NJRedman » Sat Jul 17, 2021 7:05 pm

Hall2012 wrote:
NJRedman wrote:
Hall2012 wrote:
There's nothing shady about hiring Tiny Morton. It was 100% out in the open and well within the rules. Now, Morton himself seems a bit of a shady character and I certainly think it was risky on Willard's part to bring him anywhere near the program, but there's no evidence of wrongdoing from Willard there.


Didn't even mention Tiny and that just proves my point. Willard isn't above doing shady shit to keep his job. Now with this going on look for him to jump ship after this season to any power conference program most likely a lower level power program like a BC, Wake, Pitt etc.


Proves your point, how? That I reasonably assumed you were referencing something butt hurt SJU fans still moan about 8 years later? Bottom line is there was nothing shady about it. Willard didn't hide that he was hiring Tiny because he didn't have to because it wasn't in violation of anything.


I didn't mention Tiny and you feel the need to post this huge defense of something that isn't a big deal. Sure pal, Willard is always on the up and up and never does anything shady. The best player your program has had in 30 years is just lying, thats much better.
User avatar
NJRedman
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:40 am

Re: Let's review Seton Hall

Postby kayako » Sun Jul 18, 2021 11:32 am

SJUBBALL wrote:This sucks because that suit seems like complete BS however it will without a doubt make it harder to recruit


Willard needs to get his guys stick in the NBA and making good comments about Seton Hall. That's one way to kind of protect yourself from potential rogue allegations. Maybe Mamu?
supernova
User avatar
kayako
 
Posts: 3836
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 5:22 am

PreviousNext

Return to Big East basketball message board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 37 guests