Keep in mind the B1G in 2017 is going to nine conferences games, so more inventory to go around.stever20 wrote:FlyJays wrote:^
THIS. I follow sports as close or more closely than almost anybody I know. And outside of a few local games during the regular season that I'll have on as background noise (maybe 2 or 3) and a handful of random playoff games, I'm just not interested in MLB. The game is too slow, the season is too long, and the league is stale. This coming from someone who played baseball as a kid. I'm much more likely to turn on an MLS game than I am an MLB game at this point (the growth of MLS is an entirely different topic) Baseball is similar to hockey, in that there are very small pockets of the country that follow the sport (mostly in the northeast/great lakes) but largely speaking, the country just isn't interested in it like they are football and basketball.
Unless FS1 gets some legitimate football or basketball rights to supplement the Big East, the network isn't going to make waves. Baseball and UFC don't cut it.
Totally agree. Especially with the UFC- I think if anything that's more of a turnoff than almost everything else. MLB still gets decent ratings.
I'm not even so sure if Fox got Big Ten split(they aren't going to totally leave ESPN)- that FS1 would get good enough football rights to be great. I mean ESPN is showing this weekend-
Iowa/Minnesota
Wisconsin/Purdue
Michigan/Northwestern
(you say you didn't list Ohio St/Michigan St- that game would NEVER be on FS1.)
FS1 would likely get 1 of those 3 games that I listed. How is that much better than what they have now?
Basketball yeah, it's great. But basketball just doesn't drive the ratings that football does.
stever20 wrote:Read his comment. It was that folks that wanted to watch the game couldn't. Now I agree with you that with guides etc. that seems strange.
And the fact that Bud did say that they were going to have to look at it in the offseason- should give you pause. That's my point....
As far as the Big Ten- yes they'll go to 9 conference games- but lets take this weekend. ESPN has the 3 games that I mentioned. The other 4 teams that are off this weekend are Maryland, Rutgers, Illinois, and Nebraska. What sexy game could they have with any of those 4 games that are even decent tv games? Maybe Nebraska/Illinois. Best case they get this weekend a Iowa/Minnesota game for FS1. Is that a good game? Yes. But is it a game changer for FS1???
stever20 wrote:Read his comment. It was that folks that wanted to watch the game couldn't. Now I agree with you that with guides etc. that seems strange.
And the fact that Bud did say that they were going to have to look at it in the offseason- should give you pause. That's my point....
As far as the Big Ten- yes they'll go to 9 conference games- but lets take this weekend. ESPN has the 3 games that I mentioned. The other 4 teams that are off this weekend are Maryland, Rutgers, Illinois, and Nebraska. What sexy game could they have with any of those 4 games that are even decent tv games? Maybe Nebraska/Illinois. Best case they get this weekend a Iowa/Minnesota game for FS1. Is that a good game? Yes. But is it a game changer for FS1???
Xudash wrote:I don't understand this "FS1" is a buried channel business.
On my system, ESPN flagship station is at 140 on the dial and FS1 is at 150. If the glass is half empty, then they're both buried (i.e. for being above 100). If the glass is half full, then they're both very much in proximity to one another; clearly no advantage to ESPN.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests