NJRedman wrote:MUBoxer wrote:Django wrote:Good for him. Penny and Marshall both coming out against UCONN's departure is a litmus test of what schools are basketball schools n the AAC.
Cincy is too angry and bitter to be as honest as Memphis and Wichita State. The rest are just mediocre, bad and horrible football schools.
To be fair Houston has a b-ball history most this conference would trade for in a heartbeat and temple's program history is no laughing matter either. Not just WSU Memphis and Cinci left.
I would say some, Phi Slamma Jamma was a short stint of excitement. Still pissed St. John's forgot to pick up Olajuwon at JFK. Yes, thats a true story.
https://www.zagsblog.com/2016/10/18/st- ... -olajuwon/
Can you imagine the Ewing/Olajuwon battles in MSG? Him teamed with Mullin! We would have won a championship for sure.
GoldenWarrior11 wrote:As he should be. UConn Basketball was a huge draw for all the programs when they entered the league. It was the biggest chip that was used in differentiating the AAC from C-USA; now that UConn is gone, there is no championship-level program to anchor it.
Sadly, someone needs to tell Penny that football drives the bus. BEEP! BEEP!
SamElliott wrote:GoldenWarrior11 wrote:As he should be. UConn Basketball was a huge draw for all the programs when they entered the league. It was the biggest chip that was used in differentiating the AAC from C-USA; now that UConn is gone, there is no championship-level program to anchor it.
Sadly, someone needs to tell Penny that football drives the bus. BEEP! BEEP!
Golden warrior, Your Marquette was in CUSA.
The biggest chip in differentiating the teams that left the CUSA are the much larger media deals.
Follow the money. There are teams moving up the revenue ladder and teams moving down.
UConn has paid the biggest price.
scoscox wrote:Our boy stever is in tatters
SamElliott wrote:GoldenWarrior11 wrote:As he should be. UConn Basketball was a huge draw for all the programs when they entered the league. It was the biggest chip that was used in differentiating the AAC from C-USA; now that UConn is gone, there is no championship-level program to anchor it.
Sadly, someone needs to tell Penny that football drives the bus. BEEP! BEEP!
Golden warrior, Your Marquette was in CUSA.
The biggest chip in differentiating the teams that left the CUSA are the much larger media deals.
Follow the money. There are teams moving up the revenue ladder and teams moving down.
UConn has paid the biggest price.
scoscox wrote:Lol beyond telling people he was a Georgetown fan when pressed I don’t think I’ve seen even a Georgetown related post. Personally I think he’s a temple fan
GoldenWarrior11 wrote:Marquette was in C-USA, correct.
The current AAC members (minus UC/USF) only got higher media deals was because they were invited-up out of necessity to the (then) Big East, and because of an association with UConn.
SamElliott wrote:GoldenWarrior11 wrote:Marquette was in C-USA, correct.
The current AAC members (minus UC/USF) only got higher media deals was because they were invited-up out of necessity to the (then) Big East, and because of an association with UConn.
I’m not going to argue with you Golden Warrior.
I know both leagues well.
When Louisville, USF, and Cincinnati had the old Big East resources behind them, they were factors rather quickly. It doesn’t matter which sport, the money and exposure put a new engine behind their athletics programs.
Not only them. As you know..
Success in Collegiate athletics is all about revenue and exposure (and coaching). It’s always been that way.
As you pointed out, Marquette has been in a lot of other conferences. Just like the other old CUSA teams. I remember that Marquette team in CUSA well. Marquette is probably more identified with CUSA than most because of the Wade team.
You are right. Having UConn those first 6 years helped the AAC build up to that first contract. UConn put a lot of equity in building up that league. It was likely a factor in bringing Wichita State and brand name coaches into the league. Then, when they played the games, those teams used the Huskies in their post-Calhoun era to build cred.
The UConn that is coming into this conference will need to reconnect to the Calhoun success/results because Houston, Memphis, UCF, etc, have used up a good amount of UConn’s “rep points” to push their own teams forward.
I, for one, enjoy the dynamic ecosystem of college sports. Of course if UConn MBB was coming into the league after a steady number of NCAA appearances, that would be a different statement altogether.
Hopefully UConn can get it going again. I know how it is to lose a coach.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests