gtmoBlue wrote:USC handled Nova pretty well... exhibition.
Page: https://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaab/
video: https://www.usatoday.com/ef50af59-d12b- ... 491a4c2aa6
ArmyVet wrote:gtmoBlue wrote:USC handled Nova pretty well... exhibition.
Page: https://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaab/
video: https://www.usatoday.com/ef50af59-d12b- ... 491a4c2aa6
Probably hard to infer much about any Big East team playing without their leader and starting PG.
scoscox wrote:Providence has more talent than almost anyone in the conference besides villanova. The harsh truth is they've been sub-100 in offensive efficiency 4 years in a row. Unless that gets fixed, I have no reason to think they'll be able to take the next step to become an elite team and compete for the league title
Honestly I don't know how that doesn't alarm more providence fans. 4 years is a pretty good sample size and it's not like you haven't had the talent to be better. Watching you guys run offense is like pulling teeth.
hoyahooligan wrote:scoscox wrote:Providence has more talent than almost anyone in the conference besides villanova. The harsh truth is they've been sub-100 in offensive efficiency 4 years in a row. Unless that gets fixed, I have no reason to think they'll be able to take the next step to become an elite team and compete for the league title
Honestly I don't know how that doesn't alarm more providence fans. 4 years is a pretty good sample size and it's not like you haven't had the talent to be better. Watching you guys run offense is like pulling teeth.
I think shooting is a talent and providence doesn't have any. That's the main problem with their team is they can't shoot. Great Defense and they should get more open looks with Pimpkins, but the question is will they be able to knock down those open shots. Their FT shooting indicates: No.
hoyahooligan wrote:scoscox wrote:Providence has more talent than almost anyone in the conference besides villanova. The harsh truth is they've been sub-100 in offensive efficiency 4 years in a row. Unless that gets fixed, I have no reason to think they'll be able to take the next step to become an elite team and compete for the league title
Honestly I don't know how that doesn't alarm more providence fans. 4 years is a pretty good sample size and it's not like you haven't had the talent to be better. Watching you guys run offense is like pulling teeth.
I think shooting is a talent and providence doesn't have any. That's the main problem with their team is they can't shoot. Great Defense and they should get more open looks with Pimpkins, but the question is will they be able to knock down those open shots. Their FT shooting indicates: No.
Django wrote:
Defensive athleticism is also a talent, and a talent that Creighton is still needing 7 years after joining the BEAST. We’ve led the conference in shooting and even with two of the best shooters on one team we didn’t win a championship. Nova and X are the only two teams that legitimately can claim both, followed by Hall and then Providence... Nova obviously is far above the rest but those schools are the only ones to have won a championship in the last 7 years.
Hall2012 wrote:Django wrote:
Defensive athleticism is also a talent, and a talent that Creighton is still needing 7 years after joining the BEAST. We’ve led the conference in shooting and even with two of the best shooters on one team we didn’t win a championship. Nova and X are the only two teams that legitimately can claim both, followed by Hall and then Providence... Nova obviously is far above the rest but those schools are the only ones to have won a championship in the last 7 years.
Sorry, claim both what? Shooting and defense? Not challenging, just unsure what you're saying.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 9 guests