GumbyDamnit! wrote:Adoraz, they won each game by 10+. The Penn game got tight but there was no risk of losing the SJU (PA) or LS games.
Husky_U wrote:Ya, I'm ok with permanently locking Cuse/Pitt out of the Garden. After all, Bumheim did say he doesn't have the availability to continue scheduling UCONN...
gosports1 wrote:Husky_U wrote:Ya, I'm ok with permanently locking Cuse/Pitt out of the Garden. After all, Bumheim did say he doesn't have the availability to continue scheduling UCONN...
I feel like I heard a similar comment from UConn about Providence.
DeltaV wrote:Hall2012 wrote:
I certainly love the idea of doing a regular season MSG event, but the challenges all seem to revolve around making them conference games. I'd like to see something like "Big East vs Old Big East" challenge - perhaps a pair of double headers featuring local Big East teams vs football sellouts. And play it on the BET floor lol
Game 1: St. John's vs Rutgers
(Giving them to SJU since SHU already had a series with them)
Game 2: Villanova vs Pitt
Game 3: Seton Hall vs ...idk? Louisville or Notre Dame? There's not really another geographically obvious one
Game 4: Uconn vs Syracuse (the nightcap so we don't have to worry about all of your OTs screwing up the rest of the schedule)
Though I'll file this one away with another one I'd like to see that'll never happen (an exempt tourney at MSG featuring all NY and NJ teams - SHU, SJU, RU, Cuse, Princeton, Iona...maybe Monmouth and Stony Brook?). Or the all NJ one at the Prudential Center that would also never happen.
Why would we allow the teams which killed the Big East access to the Garden, our crown jewel? Those teams are hurting because of their lack of northeastern exposure, even with their 30 pieces of silver football money. I'll consider pissing on them if they're on fire, but other than that let them play down on tobacco road.
Even more, why highlight the old big east vs. "new"? We're the Big East. We're doing fine, no need to sit around and mull about the old girlfriend.
And, leave our Big 5 alone. It's a Philly thing; if you don't get it, that's your problem. We'll figure it out.
Letsgonova wrote:I'd guess that we lose one of the cupcakes and one of the high- or mid-level matchups. The Big 5 is great - we get a bunch of top 150 games with zero travel burden, pay no $100K buy game fees and win basically all of them. Why would we ever stop doing that?
Letsgonova wrote:18 BE games
4 Big 5 games
1 exempt tourney
2 high-level OOC (e.g. Kansas + Ohio State this year)
1 mid-level OOC (UCONN the last three years)
2-3 cupcakes, often with one of those at a neutral site in NJ or somewhere else that Jay values showing the flag.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests