Bogg wrote:Maybe I'm just weird, but a game that ends with both teams being declared "champions", as well as a third team that didn't play in the game being a "champion" too, a week before you play games to determine the actual champion seems like as much of a participation trophy as there is.
Give me actual championships all day every day.
Bogg wrote:Maybe I'm just weird, but a game that ends with both teams being declared "champions", as well as a third team that didn't play in the game being a "champion" too, a week before you play games to determine the actual champion seems like as much of a participation trophy as there is.
Give me actual championships all day every day.
scoscox wrote:To be clear, neither of them are participation trophies
David St. Hubbins wrote:In 2016, nova was a 2 seed but won the NCAA championship. In 17, they were the number 1 overall seed in the tourney but lost in the second round. By some of your logic, as a nova fan I should prefer 17. I’ll let you in on a secret....I don’t!
scoscox wrote:David St. Hubbins wrote:In 2016, nova was a 2 seed but won the NCAA championship. In 17, they were the number 1 overall seed in the tourney but lost in the second round. By some of your logic, as a nova fan I should prefer 17. I’ll let you in on a secret....I don’t!
not sure how this is relevant to the discussion
scoscox wrote:David St. Hubbins wrote:In 2016, nova was a 2 seed but won the NCAA championship. In 17, they were the number 1 overall seed in the tourney but lost in the second round. By some of your logic, as a nova fan I should prefer 17. I’ll let you in on a secret....I don’t!
not sure how this is relevant to the discussion
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests