boyonthedock wrote:Marquette comes in at #16, a 4 seed, and the article has a slew of factual and grammatical errors, referring to such players as "Duane Johnson" and "Trey Blue," and with [sic]s all over the place. I think the champion of the Big East will earn at least a 3 seed, but only time will tell. But five teams in the tourney still means Respect Town, Population: Big East so I can't complain too much... about the number of teams. If I could find the comments section, I would complain very loudly about the many errors the article contains.
MUBoxer wrote:boyonthedock wrote:Marquette comes in at #16, a 4 seed, and the article has a slew of factual and grammatical errors, referring to such players as "Duane Johnson" and "Trey Blue," and with [sic]s all over the place. I think the champion of the Big East will earn at least a 3 seed, but only time will tell. But five teams in the tourney still means Respect Town, Population: Big East so I can't complain too much... about the number of teams. If I could find the comments section, I would complain very loudly about the many errors the article contains.
About where the coaches poll has us and where I see this team so I'm not upset. I think we get up to no 12 or 11 and down to 23 at some point but pretty much stay in the teens leading to a 3 or 4 seed based on how we are in conference.
Daffron24 wrote:MUBoxer wrote:boyonthedock wrote:Marquette comes in at #16, a 4 seed, and the article has a slew of factual and grammatical errors, referring to such players as "Duane Johnson" and "Trey Blue," and with [sic]s all over the place. I think the champion of the Big East will earn at least a 3 seed, but only time will tell. But five teams in the tourney still means Respect Town, Population: Big East so I can't complain too much... about the number of teams. If I could find the comments section, I would complain very loudly about the many errors the article contains.
About where the coaches poll has us and where I see this team so I'm not upset. I think we get up to no 12 or 11 and down to 23 at some point but pretty much stay in the teens leading to a 3 or 4 seed based on how we are in conference.
I'm fine where MU is ranked. I think if we can win early ie beat tOsu, win the wooden tourney, beat ASU, and UNM we will easily in the top ten. Obviously that's wishful thinking, but I think we'll be in the 10-15 range most of the year. I'm glad the BE is getting some love in the tourney, and I think the BE teams picked to be the tourney can move up a seed after all is said and done.
boyonthedock wrote:Daffron24 wrote:MUBoxer wrote:
About where the coaches poll has us and where I see this team so I'm not upset. I think we get up to no 12 or 11 and down to 23 at some point but pretty much stay in the teens leading to a 3 or 4 seed based on how we are in conference.
I'm fine where MU is ranked. I think if we can win early ie beat tOsu, win the wooden tourney, beat ASU, and UNM we will easily in the top ten. Obviously that's wishful thinking, but I think we'll be in the 10-15 range most of the year. I'm glad the BE is getting some love in the tourney, and I think the BE teams picked to be the tourney can move up a seed after all is said and done.
If I were to look at it as a poll, yeah its a fine ranking. I just think even if the big east champ has like a #18 poll ranking come tourney time they will still earn a top 3 seed.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 16 guests