stever20 wrote:Xudash wrote:TheBall wrote:Seriously it is year two of a decade long deal. Why nitpick stuff. The ratings this year improved from last across the board. The fox national games were great. Things keep getting better. We don't have a now or never mandate, we are growing together.
The Simpsons started on the Tracy Ulman show and nobody knew anything about them for almost half a decade. Thirty years later the show is doing fine. Thanks to fox patience and eye for opportunity and investment in long term ambitions. Fox News took a while to catch cnn before passing it by. And fox don't have to pass espn by to be a success. They just want to be in the game.
Exactly.
It amazes me how some people around here cannot grasp the long-term nature of this whole thing.
But the question is, especially if the Big Ten doesn't come to Fox, what is going to exactly change in the next 5 years to bring more eyeballs? After the Big Ten, there's just nothing out there to really bid on that could help out FS1 at all.
stever20 wrote:The problem fs1 has with the 1st point is they need programming that would make the cable companies decision easy. Fact is a network with really only UFC, Nascar, MLB, and a limited amount of college sports, that's getting terrible ratings- cable companies can play hardball.
#2- MLB was on the playoffs on FS1 this year and it didn't make them aware at all.
#3- I think that's such a bogus point. Providence isn't where they are right now because all of a sudden it's 10 teams. They recruited the kids like Dunn and Henton while it was a 16 team big east. If it was the old Big East, Providence would still be damn good. If anything it made things easier. I mean last year if PC doesn't win the BET they don't make the tourney. That would NEVER have been the case in the old 16 team Big East. Those schools that you mentioned got buried because they couldn't hire a good coach. Providence hired Cooley and look what we have.
TheBall wrote:Saw gtown v johnnies last week was at 888k viewers.
TheBall wrote:Saw gtown v johnnies last week was at 888k viewers.
TheBall wrote:stever20 wrote:The problem fs1 has with the 1st point is they need programming that would make the cable companies decision easy. Fact is a network with really only UFC, Nascar, MLB, and a limited amount of college sports, that's getting terrible ratings- cable companies can play hardball.
#2- MLB was on the playoffs on FS1 this year and it didn't make them aware at all.
#3- I think that's such a bogus point. Providence isn't where they are right now because all of a sudden it's 10 teams. They recruited the kids like Dunn and Henton while it was a 16 team big east. If it was the old Big East, Providence would still be damn good. If anything it made things easier. I mean last year if PC doesn't win the BET they don't make the tourney. That would NEVER have been the case in the old 16 team Big East. Those schools that you mentioned got buried because they couldn't hire a good coach. Providence hired Cooley and look what we have.
Wrong
First, fox already has a sports station on the basic cable package. It is a regional one. They will eventually switch them up. You can try to explain to me that they cannot, but they will.
Second, mlb playoffs were on fs1 last yr, and more people learned about the station. And next year even more people will. Uefa soccer is all over fs1, and that's helping too (I watch uefa). And while UFC and NASCAR are different demographics than big east hoops, that still helps increase awareness.
And the third point is absolutely true. 100%. These schools were buried, they were cast aside, they rarely got espn games and rarely got mentioned. Providence and St. John's are in better position to build their brands moving forward and to continue positive momentum. Feel free to disagree, but I think what has happened to Boston college is sort of what PC and the johnnies had to go through in the old big east. It wasn't a good fit for them. Yes, coaching was a problem too, but I see this new platform as a better fit.
But you can complain about us not being on espn news. I totally disagree. We are in such a better position.
TheBall wrote:Something that will be interesting is how the mls Sunday games on espn2 do against the ones on fs1.
They are doing a triple header, with the earlier one on espn. They are co-marketing it as a package.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests