pitchersduel wrote:JohnT wrote:I was told at the beginning that exactly this would occur. XU, Butler, and Creighton in 2013. SlU and Dayton in 2014. So far, exactly as planned.
UD and SLU fans - relax.
i hope you're right.
were you told by any chance why it would be setup that way? i mean if they know its SLU/dayton...why wouldnt they go ahead and either a) include them now or b) announce their intention to add both next year?
xu95 wrote:pitchersduel wrote:JohnT wrote:I was told at the beginning that exactly this would occur. XU, Butler, and Creighton in 2013. SlU and Dayton in 2014. So far, exactly as planned.
UD and SLU fans - relax.
i hope you're right.
were you told by any chance why it would be setup that way? i mean if they know its SLU/dayton...why wouldnt they go ahead and either a) include them now or b) announce their intention to add both next year?
I think they have made it quite clear that they don't know who #11 and #12 is. You can listen to any of the interviews during or after the announcement to come to that conclusion.
xu95 wrote:pitchersduel wrote:JohnT wrote:I was told at the beginning that exactly this would occur. XU, Butler, and Creighton in 2013. SlU and Dayton in 2014. So far, exactly as planned.
i hope you're right.
were you told by any chance why it would be setup that way? i mean if they know its SLU/dayton...why wouldnt they go ahead and either a) include them now or b) announce their intention to add both next year?
I think they have made it quite clear that they don't know who #11 and #12 is. You can listen to any of the interviews during or after the announcement to come to that conclusion.
thats what i'm saying. but you have had numerous people saying the SLU/dayton in '14 thing on this board. EMT, bostonfriar, and now johnt. i don't get how you dont press whatever source you have for more info why the wait if indeed true.
cm5yz6 wrote:
They were obviously unfounded claims.
pitchersduel wrote:cm5yz6 wrote:
They were obviously unfounded claims.
could be true...though a few people stood up for bostonfriar saying he was pretty solid with his info on the providence boards over the years. really when you think about...they're still in the mix for being completely right.
classof29 wrote:pitchersduel wrote:cm5yz6 wrote:
They were obviously unfounded claims.
could be true...though a few people stood up for bostonfriar saying he was pretty solid with his info on the providence boards over the years. really when you think about...they're still in the mix for being completely right.
Boston definitely has good information. I was surprised out how close lipped the presidents were on this whole thing. If boston was mentioning St.L and Dayton, then it likely came from pretty high up - even if it didn't/doesn't end up being true.
cm5yz6 wrote:classof29 wrote:
Boston definitely has good information. I was surprised out how close lipped the presidents were on this whole thing. If boston was mentioning St.L and Dayton, then it likely came from pretty high up - even if it didn't/doesn't end up being true.
It kind of sounds more like you want him to be right rather than him actually being right.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 28 guests