BillEsq wrote:1. I don't think that Biondi leaving or not leaving will have any real effect on SLU's chances to get in the the BE.
2. I don't SLU did anything in particular that kept it out of the BE (thats positive or negative).
3. Yorost, i usually agree with you but I could easily provide an reasonable and solid argument that would say that Creighton was not the best option for 10. I do not see where their resume is clearly better than Slu's, Dayton's, or Richmond's. (Creighton has only played 6 top 100 SOS years in the past 20)
4. I still think Creighton is a good fit to the BE (always have always will)
5. I did not win anything at the derby. (but broke about even)
7. I still think we go to 12 teams soon with an announcement by July 1.
8. I think Marquette's average attendance in lacrosse in a building year only shows the potential for lacrosse for the BE.
BillEsq wrote:8. I think Marquette's average attendance in lacrosse in a building year only shows the potential for lacrosse for the BE.
BillEsq wrote:8. I think Marquette's average attendance in lacrosse in a building year only shows the potential for lacrosse for the BE.
yorost wrote:BillEsq wrote:8. I think Marquette's average attendance in lacrosse in a building year only shows the potential for lacrosse for the BE.
Men's? I don't want to be negative about it, but two home games isn't very telling. One was the first ever and the second was Duke,
Edrick wrote:BUTLER - BIG EAST
EVANSVILLE - MVC
INDIANA - BIG TEN
INDIANA STATE - MVC
IPFW - SUMMIT
IUPUI - SUMMIT
NOTRE DAME - ACC
PURDUE - BIG TEN
VALPO - HORIZON
----INDIANA PACERS
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], RxJay1 and 15 guests